June 12, 2026: All Newsclips

Lead Stories

John Cornyn offers blunt talk for fellow Republicans on his way out

Don’t expect to see Sen. John Cornyn at the state Republican convention this week in Houston after losing the GOP runoff last month to Attorney General Ken Paxton. “I might have to miss it this year,” Cornyn told The Dallas Morning News. In a blunt assessment, Cornyn said the state party is dysfunctional, as evidenced by the small slice of the electorate who voted in the May 26 runoff. And the four-term senator offered a warning for the Texas GOP as it seeks to defeat Democrats like Paxton’s opponent, state Rep. James Talarico of Austin.

click here for more

“They need to decide: Do you want to actually win or are you putting on a performance to the keyboard warriors on social media?” Cornyn said. “The simple fact is that unless you can win elections you can't govern and you become irrelevant and it seems to me that's the path they're headed on right now.” As the Senate wrapped up its work for the week, Cornyn, 74, said Republicans remain vulnerable on the economy, citing high gas prices and stubborn inflation driven in part by the conflict with Iran. “Standards of living are going down all across the country,” Cornyn said. “While I support the president's efforts to pacify the Iranian regime, the fact that we're not talking about or focused on the things that most people care about at election time, kitchen table issues…is a problem.” Speaking to reporters Thursday, Cornyn weighed in on a series of political and policy issues.

SpaceX finalizes IPO price at $135 a share in world’s largest public offering

SpaceX, Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite maker, officially finalized its initial public offering price to become the world’s largest stock market debut, in a testament to the tech mogul’s influence and people’s belief in his business vision. On Thursday, SpaceX confirmed its I.P.O. price was set at $135 a share and that it would sell more than 555 million shares, according to a company statement. That means SpaceX would raise around $75 billion from its offering, putting its valuation at $1.77 trillion. With those numbers, SpaceX would shatter an I.P.O. record previously set by Saudi Aramco. Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil company was valued at $1.7 trillion and raised more than $29 billion when it went public in 2019. SpaceX will begin trading publicly on Friday under the ticker symbol SPCX.

click here for more

A SpaceX spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. SpaceX’s long journey to the stock market has been accompanied by many superlatives. Apart from being the biggest-ever I.P.O., SpaceX is also the most dominant space company from the world’s richest man. And it would become the benchmark for a wave of other offerings, which are all expected to unleash an avalanche of wealth across Silicon Valley and Wall Street, creating influential new titans in the process. Anthropic, the artificial intelligence start-up that makes the Claude chatbot, and its ChatGPT-making rival, OpenAI, have both confidentially filed to go public in recent days. Each company has a valuation approaching $1 trillion. If Anthropic and OpenAI successfully pull off public offerings, it would mean another milestone: Three-trillion-dollar companies reaching the stock market for the first time. A defining trait of the offerings is that they are likely to make those who are already wealthy even wealthier. At $135 a share, the SpaceX stake controlled by Mr. Musk would be worth more than $860 billion. (He cannot sell some of the SpaceX shares he controls until the company hits various operational milestones, according to the firm’s filings.) And a slight increase in the company’s share price in its first days of trading — perhaps as soon as Friday — could turn Mr. Musk, 54, into the world’s first trillionaire.

Harris County flood director resigns amid Harvey project delays

Harris County Flood Control District Executive Director Tina Petersen resigned Thursday amid concerns about her handling of and communication about a federal grant program with strict deadlines. Her decision to step down came after commissioners for a second time in recent weeks discussed her job performance in a closed session Thursday morning, and as hundreds of millions of dollars in Hurricane Harvey recovery aid remain in limbo, tied up in projects that are projected to miss state or federal spending deadlines. Commissioners did not immediately name a successor, but County Judge Lina Hidalgo said they plan to appoint Petersen's replacement at a meeting June 25.

click here for more

"It’s always difficult to make personnel changes, especially at the highest levels of county government," Hidalgo said. "This was not an easy process, but I believe it is the right decision. I look forward to appointing Dr. Petersen’s successor at the next business court." Commissioners learned in January about delays in the program, sparking criticism from some court members who felt they were not adequately informed about the risk of losing federal funds. Petersen said in a letter that she "plan(s) to continue to be available to implement a transition plan." "It has been an honor to serve the residents of Harris County and this team," Petersen wrote. "While I am confident in this organization and the work we have underway, it is clear to me that conversations about my role have become a distraction." The flood control district recently unveiled a plan that officials say is a viable solution to some of the issues, but Commissioner Tom Ramsey said Thursday morning he felt the plan came far too late.

State Stories

SpaceX seeks more Texas tax breaks, says Terafab could go elsewhere without them

Last week, SpaceX was awarded tax breaks by a rural Texas county for its massive Terafab chip manufacturing factory. Now, the Elon Musk-led company wants more — and says it will consider moving the project out of Texas if it doesn’t get them. An entity called TeraFab AI LLC has filed for exemptions under the Texas Jobs, Energy, Technology and Innovation program, which provides a 10-year reduction in property taxes that help fund the operations of local school districts. The applications were filed Monday with the Texas Comptroller for tax breaks from Anderson-Shiro Consolidated Independent School District and Iola Independent School District. Both operate near the site in Grimes County where SpaceX is planning to build a semiconductor manufacturing plant on thousands of acres it’s been making deals to acquire.

click here for more

Beyond seeking tax breaks, the TeraFab AI applications reveal new details about the project. They lay out plans for up to four construction phases with the first starting this year. For phase one, investment in property improvement, machinery and equipment is estimated to reach $10.37 billion by 2029, according to a document filed with the application to Anderson Shiro CISD. The application to Iola ISD lists a $6.43 billion investment for its first phase. Total investment is expected to range from $55 billion to $119 billion for the initial four phases, with further expansion possible. The applications call for creation of 4,234 jobs and tout benefits for the state through the project’s long-term economic impact and tax revenue. The numbers differ from those laid out in SpaceX’s economic development agreement with Grimes County. The Starbase-based company, which has not yet signed that deal, would only be required to complete a capital investment of $5 billion and create 1,800 jobs to receive total county tax relief. Nathan Jensen, a professor in the department of government at the University of Texas at Austin, noted that details to verify compliance with the Grimes County deal are slim and that there is a clause that allows SpaceX to challenge its tax appraisal. In what Jensen describes as a “shocking oversight,” the agreement documents don’t specify wage standards for jobs created.

Regional Transportation Council approves new TxDOT agreement

Regional Transportation Council members on Thursday approved the signing of an agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation, a key document in a lingering dispute with the North Central Texas Council of Governments executive board. In a 41-4 vote, RTC members requested that executive board members sign a Metropolitan Planning Organization agreement to remain the body’s fiscal agent. Outgoing chair Rick Bailey, a Johnson County commissioner, immediately signed the agreement after the vote. The issue stems from the recent firing of North Texas transportation director Michael Morris by Todd Little, council of governments executive director. The NCTCOG board claims Little had the authority to fire Morris, although two state district judges upheld the assertion that the RTC is the policy-making body for North Texas transportation funding decisions. Morris was later reinstated.

click here for more

Rob Walters, an attorney for the transportation council, said the independent policy-making body is recognized as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for North Texas because it received federal government certification in 2025 as it has every four years since 1995. Walters said the council regularly approves transportation funding decisions that go directly to implementing agencies without approvals by the council of governments executive board, which pays the organization’s bills. In addition, the RTC “is the only entity in the region” that meets federal requirements on voting authority by transit entities, TxDOT representation, fair-share allocation of voting weights and membership from policy officials within the designated area, according to the RTC agenda. In Texas, the NCTCOG executive board can’t be designated as both the Metropolitan Planning Organization and the fiscal agent at the same time, Walters said. NCTCOG leadership contends in the April 6 lawsuit that the executive board is the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The executive board was accused of overreach in its duties as the council’s fiscal agent, according to the lawsuit by Denton County.

Former GOP official says he won't vote for Paxton in ad

As Texas Republicans meet for their state convention in Houston to project unity after heated primaries, the former top Republican elected official in the state’s biggest red county will take over local radio airwaves with one message: “I won’t vote for Ken Paxton.” The one-minute ad featuring former Tarrant County Judge Glen Whitley will be blasted on conservative airwaves in Houston on Friday and Saturday during the GOP’s state convention. The pro-James Talarico super PAC, Lone Star Rising, spent around $5,000 for an initial ad run during the convention but will continue to air the spot throughout the campaign season. In the ad, Whitley — who continues to identify as a Republican — notes his 16-year tenure as the top county executive in “the largest red county in America.”

click here for more

“I supported the rule of law and stood for faith and family. I still believe in those conservative values,” Whitley says. “Ken Paxton has spent years embarrassing Texas. He’s known for scandal, indictment, infidelity and putting his own interests ahead of Texans. That’s exactly why I cannot support Ken Paxton.” Whitley adds that he’s not alone, noting that 60 Republican members of the Texas House impeached Paxton in 2023 for abusing his office to benefit a donor, who helped Paxton’s alleged mistress secure a job. Paxton was later acquitted by the Texas Senate. “This November, I’ll proudly support conservative candidates on the ballot,” Whitley says in the ad. “But I won’t vote for Ken Paxton.” The Republican adds: “Being a conservative is about character, integrity and accountability. If you still believe those values matter, don’t vote for Ken Paxton.” Whitley, who is seen as a member of the more traditional, business-friendly wing of the GOP, has broken with his party in the past. In 2022, he supported Mike Collier, the Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, over Republican Dan Patrick. Patrick won that election.

Local Texas election officials await appointment of new secretary of state as midterm preparations ramp up

Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson’s unexpected departure only a few months before the November midterm election, which includes one of the most hotly contested U.S. Senate races the state has seen in years, has some local election officials and voting rights advocates worrying the transition will complicate their ability to administer a smooth election. “It’s the unknown, the uncertainty that is scary,” said Tandi Smith, the Kaufman County elections administrator. “Are we going to continue to receive guidance? Are we going to be ensured that we’ll be prepared for any coming changes? We just don’t know.” Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, is required by law to appoint a new secretary as soon as possible. His office, in an emailed statement, said the new appointee would be announced “at a later date.”

click here for more

Nelson, who has been the state’s chief election official for more than three years, last week announced that she’d be stepping down from the role effective July 17. Nelson’s departure will happen just as election officials across the state are preparing in earnest for the November general election. In the summer months, they’ll be recruiting election workers, seeking polling locations, and processing voter registration applications, among other duties. Some voting rights advocates say a new appointee may want to direct local election officials to change election procedures, which could lead to chaos and confusion for voters. Although the secretary of state’s office has no law enforcement authority and can’t change the law, it can issue election law opinions on how to implement election and voting rules. “If the new secretary of state has a laundry list of demands that election administrators can’t meet, that’s going to throw our elections into disarray,” said Emily Eby French, policy director at Common Cause Texas. French noted that there were three secretaries of state between 2017 and Nelson’s appointment in 2023, some of whom remained in the role only for about a year before resigning.

Appeals court rules in favor of former Rep. Pickett in lawsuit against city’s environmental franchise fee on trash bills

The Texas 8th Court of Appeals Tuesday upheld a lower court’s decision that the city of El Paso’s environmental franchise fee tacked on to residential water bills is an illegal tax. The court ruling Tuesday creates the possibility that the city could have to refund some of the tens of millions of dollars collected since the levy went into effect in 2015. The case was brought by former state Rep. Joe Pickett in a lawsuit against the city. “The opinion says it’s an illegal fee, and so I’m entitled to ask for a refund, and so if I’m entitled to ask for one, everybody in El Paso that pays a garbage and water bill is entitled to ask for a refund,” Pickett told El Paso Matters.

click here for more

City officials in an email statement to El Paso Matters said they’re reviewing the decision “and evaluating all of our legal options at this time.” The city has incurred about $30,000 in outside counsel fees on the case, officials said. If the city wants to challenge the latest ruling, it could appeal to the Texas Supreme Court. The city appealed District Court Judge Patrick Garcia’s August 2024 ruling that the fee was unconstitutional and should be discontinued based on the lawsuit first filed by Pickett in October 2020. The appeals court and trial court sided with Pickett that the $6 franchise fee is an illegal tax and not lawful “because the city used it primarily to raise general revenue rather than to cover the actual costs associated with garbage trucks’ wear and tear on city streets,” the opinion by Chief Justice Maria Salas Mendoza states.

Fort Worth ISD hit hard by principal turnover following TEA takeover of district

Fort Worth ISD has named new leaders at dozens of its campuses in recent weeks after a string of principals announced their plans to leave their jobs following the uncertainty of the Texas Education Agency’s takeover of the district, with several other principal positions still open. District leaders see the turnover as an opportunity to appoint new principals who can spark academic progress at some of Fort Worth ISD’s longest-struggling campuses. A number of principals left on their own accord. Numerous others were not retained by new state-appointed district leadership. The district named 19 principals for the recently-created Elevate Network, a group of schools handpicked by Superintendent Peter Licata and his team because of persistent underwhelming academic performance.

click here for more

Of the 19 campuses, 12 will have new principals. Five of those 12 are new to the district, a spokesperson previously told the Star-Telegram. Since then, the district has named new principals at more than 20 other campuses as well. Nearly a dozen other principals have announced their decision to leave the district following the end of the 2025-26 school year. Several sources told the Star-Telegram they expect even more principal and teaching turnover following the Texas Education Agency’s takeover of the district, especially during the summer as current faculty and staff look for new jobs. While Fort Worth ISD leadership remains confident a district-wide principal shakeup can jumpstart some of its stagnant campuses, some education leaders warn that constant leadership turnover can do more harm than good. Others are concerned that long-time district employees no longer wish to work within the district and are instead opting for jobs at neighboring districts.

‘God forbid I’m excited’: Mayor who fought Spurs arena deal says it’s OK to be a fan and a skeptic

For many San Antonians, any questions about the need for a new $1.3 billion Spurs arena went out the window the day the team launched into the NBA Finals. But one high-profile San Antonian who’s been fighting the arena deal since day one is still wrestling with the roughly $800 million in public funding the arena leans on — at a time when the city faces a ballooning budget deficit. Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones was one of the few holdouts on a contract that most of the city and county’s elected leaders considered their only leverage to prevent the emotional and economic hardship of losing the Spurs to another city. Now as the NBA basketball team steps into the national spotlight, Jones is still trying to convince San Antonians that it’s possible for her to be both a fan and a shrewd negotiator.

click here for more

Despite her public feuds with the team’s owners and fans over the past year, Jones said Wednesday that she’s been getting into the spirit for the playoffs, wearing her Spurs shirt to work, accepting tickets to sit courtside at Game 6 of the Western Conference Finals against the Oklahoma City Thunder, and cracking jokes with Charles Barkley on ESPN. “God forbid I’m excited,” Jones said of the critics scrutinizing her visible fandom. Once the playoffs are over, however, Jones said she believes taxpayers will still hold city leaders accountable for cuts to city services and potential tax increases coming down the pipeline. “I think we have to cheer hard for the team, and be cognizant of [the fact that] they will very likely be champions — I’m knocking on wood — and the day afterwards, we will still have a $131 million budget gap going into [fiscal year] 2028,” Jones said in an interview Wednesday — before the Spurs’ crushing defeat in Game 4 against the Knicks. Though San Antonio is one of the fastest-growing cities in the country, it’s facing an unusual decline in property tax revenue this year as home values cool, residential and business exemptions are expanded and many high-value properties remain in reinvestment zones that effectively keep them off the tax rolls. City officials are proposing their first tax rate increase in 33 years to cover expenses that are rising faster than revenue.

Travis County judge weighs whether to move Camp Mystic lawsuits behind closed doors and out of public courtrooms

A Travis County judge on Wednesday weighed whether lawsuits filed by Camp Mystic families should be resolved outside of court. The camp and its owners are facing multiple wrongful death lawsuits after 27 campers and counselors died when floodwaters swept through the Kerr County camp in the early morning hours of July 4, 2025. The lawsuits accuse Camp Mystic of failing to protect their daughters. The families are fighting to get their day in court against the camp's operators. Camp Mystic lawyers are making the case for their motion to compel arbitration, which would take the proceedings behind closed doors and out of the public eye into private arbitration, not in a public courtroom.

click here for more

At issue here are the participation agreements that all the parents signed when registering their daughters for Camp Mystic last summer. Those agreements included a “binding” arbitration clause, which Camp Mystic’s lawyers say was legally valid, so they argue these lawsuits should be resolved outside the courtroom and with arbitration. The agreement highlights the risks associated with summer camp, including "the risk of 'floods,' risks caused by 'errors of judgment,' and those caused by 'careless conduct,' which the agreements warn 'in extraordinary cases, may be serious,'" according to court documents. “I understand this is an incredibly serious case. I understand that there is a lot here,” said Joshua Fiveson, an attorney representing Camp Mystic. “That does not change the legal framework, and the question is whether or not a contract was formed. It was.” Attorneys for the families who lost loved ones say the arbitration waiver they signed was on the parents' behalf, but not on the behalf of the children who died, though Camp Mystic's attorneys said they believe the agreement covered the children. While there is case law that says family members can't waive their minor children's right to seek legal recourse in personal injury cases, Camp Mystic's attorneys say no right is being waived by compelled arbitration; it is just moving it to a different legal venue.

An old well gushed waste, not oil, in a small West Texas town

An old oil well sprang back to life under the parking lot of the First Baptist Church of Grandfalls in April. Over the next eight days, more than 1.5 million gallons of toxic wastewater flowed out of the earth, according to state records. The state regulator, the Railroad Commission, spent $1.49 million plugging the leak and another $1.16 million disposing of the wastewater back underground. By early June, crews had stopped the flow and plugged the wellbore. Wastewater, fortunately, did not enter the church. The imminent threat passed. But questions linger for the church’s pastor and Permian Basin residents. Why do old wells in the area keep blowing out? What will happen if the next leak isn’t under a parking lot, but a house or school? The Permian Basin’s oil and gas wells generate prodigious quantities of wastewater, known as produced water. This salty, toxic liquid is pumped underground into injection wells, increasing underground pressure.

click here for more

This pressure is finding its way to the surface through old wells that burst and spew wastewater aboveground. The Railroad Commission requested injection wells within a five-mile radius of Grandfalls to stop pumping waste underground while the leak was being plugged. Agency spokesperson Bryce Dubee said that the old well underneath the parking lot is still under investigation. When David Tucker stepped in as the interim pastor at First Baptist last summer, his biggest concern was replacing an aging air conditioning unit. But once the leak sprang, Tucker, an oil and gas industry veteran, was uniquely qualified to help. He hopes the incident can lead to change. “This was kind of a good thing because it brought attention to what’s happening,” he said, referring to the spate of oilfield leaks and geysers in the Permian Basin. Tucker praised the Railroad Commission’s quick response but said the agency needs more resources to address the problem. “They’re trying to do a good job. But they don’t have the money to do it. They’re overwhelmed,” he said. “The state needs to turn loose some more money to start funding this.” Dubee, the RRC spokesperson, said the agency’s State Managed Plugging program “remains focused on addressing the well in Grandfalls.”

Bexar County constable says office halted ICE partnership before training began

A Bexar County constable’s office that was among the first local agencies to sign up for an expanded federal immigration enforcement partnership never completed the training required to implement the program after opposition emerged from both the public and county officials, according to Precinct 3 Constable Mark Vojvodich. The 287(g) program, established through the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996, allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to train and authorize state and local law enforcement officers to assist with certain immigration enforcement functions. Agencies that do not operate jails, such as constables’ offices and municipal police departments, participate through what is known as the “task force model,” the most expansive version of the program.

click here for more

The model allows trained officers to assist with certain immigration enforcement functions during routine law enforcement encounters. Earlier this year, the San Antonio Report reported that Bexar County’s Precinct 3 Constable’s Office, Texas Department of Public Safety, Balcones Heights Police Department and several smaller municipal agencies had entered task force model agreements as federal officials pushed to rapidly expand the program nationwide. Vojvodich said his office signed the memorandum of agreement in January and was preparing to move forward with training before deciding to stop the process. “We stopped it at that point in time because we had seen multiple people on Commissioners Court speaking against the program,” he said. “And to go further forward with the training and the reimbursement, we would have had to have Commissioners Court approval, and we knew we weren’t going to get that.” In addition, Vojvodich cited large community turnout in opposition of Immigration enforcement efforts as a signal of the dwindling possibility of approval.

Texas AG warns Big 12 against Brendan Sorsby related sanctions

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton warned the Big 12 athletic conference against taking legal action against Texas Tech University over quarterback Brendan Sorsby's sports betting scandal, according to conference Commissioner Brett Yormark. Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate against Democrat James Talarico, sent a letter to the Big 12 on Thursday that reportedly warned any action against Texas Tech could violate state and federal antitrust law and "would expose the Conference to substantial liability." "Should the Big 12 seek to sanction Texas Tech for acting consistent with the Order, Texas Tech will pursue all legal avenues to protect its interests," the letter said. In a statement, Yormak said "all options remain on the table" and the conference is "taking time with our legal counsel to understand the concerns of the state and will meet again with the full Board next week."

click here for more

The legal fight over Sorsby's eligibility has plunged college sports into chaos this week. On Monday, a Texas state district judge issued Sorsby an injunction against the NCAA that will allow him to play most of the upcoming season, despite an admission that he made at least $90,000 in sports bets while playing for Indiana University and Cincinnati. Yormak said the ruling led to “great concern amongst our membership,” and set up the possibility of sanctions against Texas Tech, which is part of the conference. At the center of the legal fight is Fort Worth oil billionaire Cody Campbell, who has spent millions of dollars recruiting athletes to Texas Tech and has defended Sorsby's right to play. Also supporting is Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, one of the lawyers who represented the quarterback in his lawsuit against the NCAA. Earlier this week, Burrows wrote on Facebook that the ruling represented "a fair and balanced outcome." "The judge’s decision includes consequences while allowing a young man to continue pursuing his education, his athletic career, and his future," he wrote. "I wish Brendan continued success in his recovery and on the field."

Veteran Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Karley Swindel cut from roster, won’t return for fifth season

Longtime Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader Karley Swindel won't be returning for a fifth season after being shockingly cut from the roster. Rumors recently began circulating online that Swindel, 26, didn't make the squad for the upcoming season. She appeared to confirm the news when she reposted a video of herself in the Dallas Cowboys uniform that included "#JusticeForKarley" via her Instagram Stories on Tuesday, June 9. That same day, the Instagram account @dcc_updates shared an "update" on the situation. "Veterans were reportedly not allowed to go to Karley in the stands after the announcements," the message that was later posted to Reddit read. "They had to stay on the field and were told to pull it together for photos."

click here for more

Marissa Leschber, a fellow DCC squad member and one of Swindel's close friends, denied the claim, which was later shared by @dcc_updates as well. "This is not true!" Leschber, 26, wrote in response. "Many of us immediately went to be with Karley and our staff members were very respectful and understanding of the gravity of the situation while still trying to show support for the new rookie candidates." Swindel earned a coveted spot on the NFL's most iconic cheerleading team in 2022, and she opened up about how it felt to realize one of her lifelong dreams. "I am so excited to officially say I am a DALLAS COWBOYS CHEERLEADER. I remember locking eyes with the DCC when I was 5 years old at Texas Stadium. I knew in that moment, I wanted to be them one day," she wrote via Facebook at the time, per KFDM.

National Stories

The World cup kicks off with two goals, three red cards and one epic fiesta

The first ever World Cup to be hosted across three countries was always going to be a delicate balancing act. All games are not created equal. So how do you divvy up the biggest spectacle in sports among three continental powers? It took FIFA more than a year to figure it out. And while the U.S. ended up with the lion’s share of the matches, Canada was left with slim pickings. But when it came time to select a host for the official opening of the 2026 World Cup, there was only one right answer. FIFA came to the place where it knew soccer heritage ran deepest: the hulking Estadio Azteca. On Thursday afternoon, in the steamy heat of the Mexican capital, this hallowed stadium became the first to host matches at three different World Cups. In 1970, it saw Pelé lift the trophy. Sixteen years later, it was Diego Maradona’s turn here.

click here for more

Now, it has also launched the biggest World Cup in history. In the first of 104 games to be held over the next five weeks, Mexico defeated South Africa 2-0 in front of more than 80,000 home fans. “Come what may,” Mexico coach Javier Aguirre said before kickoff, “it will be a celebration that endures for decades.” The supporters who packed the stands on Thursday would have signed up for it. After an opening ceremony that featured Mexican movie star Salma Hayek and Colombian pop star Shakira, they transformed into a wall of noise during Mexico’s national anthem. They booed as one when they spotted FIFA president Gianni Infantino. And they greeted El Tri, which hasn’t won a World Cup knockout game in 40 years, like it was a squad of absolute world-beaters. Never mind that the game itself didn’t quite live up to the standards set here by Pelé, Maradona, or Mexican teams past. (And the notoriously demanding Azteca crowd wasn’t shy about letting its own players know.) After taking the lead in the 9th minute through Julián Quiñones, the home side created few opportunities before the South Africans were reduced to 10 men by a red card. “I saw a desperate Mexico at some moments of the game,” South Africa coach Hugo Broos said. “They didn’t know what to do with the ball.”

Trump and allies are working on plan to ‘expunge’ impeachments

President Trump and his allies have discussed pushing lawmakers to pass a resolution aimed at voiding his first-term impeachments, according to people familiar with the matter. The resolution would allow Trump to claim a symbolic victory on a matter that has dogged him since his first term, part of a broader effort to burnish his presidential legacy. It would have little legal significance, however, because the Constitution provides no procedure for undoing an impeachment, according to experts. “It should be done because I did nothing wrong,” Trump said when asked about the resolution in a phone call this week with The Wall Street Journal. “It was a rigged deal—it was a whole rigged situation.”

click here for more

Any move to attempt to erase the two impeachments, in 2019 and 2021, would open up a debate about Trump’s past behavior in office, forcing GOP lawmakers to relitigate charges of abuse of power, obstruction of Congress and inciting an insurrection. Facing the prospect of losing their majority in the House, Republicans are trying to shift focus to the economy and high costs, the issues that voters care about most. The measure likely wouldn’t be considered until after the November election, the people familiar with the matter said. Even then, it would be difficult to garner the votes needed to pass, according to several House Republican lawmakers. Trump has posted news clips about voiding the impeachments on his Truth Social account. But this week, he played down his own role in the effort. “If they want to do it, I’m honored by it,” the president said. A Democratic-led House of Representatives in December 2019 approved articles of impeachment for allegations related to Trump’s efforts to press Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, then a Democratic candidate for president. Shortly before Trump left office in January 2021, the House passed an article of impeachment for “incitement of insurrection” over accusations he pushed supporters to storm the Capitol.

Mosques face increasing challenges to provide security amid growing anti-Muslim fervor

When two teenage shooters armed with multiple weapons began firing on the Islamic Center of San Diego last month, a licensed security guard hired by the mosque exchanged fire with the shooters and warned others to flee. That guard — Amin Abdullah — lost his life in the attack, as did two other Muslims on the property. Abdullah’s presence likely prevented a far deadlier attack, but it also raised long-standing concerns about whether Muslim institutions have adequate security, training and planning to foil such targeted attacks and, critically, whether the federal government is invested in helping them. Next week, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is expected to announce awards of $274.5 million in nonprofit security grants to houses of worship and other religious institutions. Known as the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, the program is administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency under the DHS.

click here for more

The grant program has become an anchor for many religious nonprofits as they try to harden high-risk facilities from physical and cybersecurity attacks with cameras, fencing, gates, bollards, reinforced doors and windows and ballistic film. But some Muslim organizations are already warning they don’t expect any of their institutions to receive federal security grants in this latest round of funding. “We’re not aware of any Muslim organization receiving grants, and if they did, it would be tantamount to the tokenization to say that Muslims had received the grants,” said Robert McCaw, government affairs director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations. “The entire program lacks transparency, and it’s incredibly hard to determine which communities are benefiting the most from them.” American Muslim organizations have had a long and uneasy relationship with the popular security grants program, created in 2004 in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the ensuing war on terror. But Muslim institutions’ wariness of the program has grown under the Trump administration. Last year, DHS unveiled new terms and conditions for the program that made many Muslim organizations even more concerned about applying for security grants. Those conditions require all NSGP recipients to cooperate with immigration enforcement officials, refrain from operating “any programs that advance or promote DEI” and avoid “discriminatory prohibited boycott,” which could include some forms of advocacy for Palestinian rights. Under former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, the agency reportedly paused grants for Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, review; discussed proposals for a blanket ban on Muslim organizations receiving grants; and later stripped funding from dozens of Muslim organizations, using vague allegations of extremism, according to CNN reporting.

Copyright June 12, 2026, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved